Habermas og Hayek
Bloggeren Pileus skriver om Habermas, Hayek og nytten av offentlig debatt: Though formal argumentation that takes place in democratic forums is one way in which people can learn from each other, it is by no means the most important. Far more significant is the capacity to observe the lived experience of others. Much of what we need to learn cannot be ‘put into words’ – it is ‘tacit knowledge’. Will Wilkinson kommenterer.
Publisert: 13. mars 2012
Bloggeren Pileus skriver om Habermas, Hayek og nytten av offentlig debatt. Will Wilkinson kommenterer.
«Though formal argumentation that takes place in democratic forums is one way in which people can learn from each other, it is by no means the most important. Far more significant is the capacity to observe the lived experience of other individuals and groups. Much of what we need to learn cannot be ‘put into words’ – it is ‘tacit knowledge’, which can only be communicated by observing the practical results of what other people do and imitating successful role models even when the ‘reasons’ for this success cannot be articulated verbally.»
Relatert
Alle veier fører til woke
Venezuela blir stadig mer autoritært. Heldigvis finnes det motkrefter
Den instinktive fascisten Trump
Ungarsk suverenitetsvern
Ungarn har vedtatt et lovvern av den nasjonale suverenitet. Loven er imidlertid uklar, og gir muligheter for vilkårlighet og tiltak mot politiske motstandere. Kommisjonen mener loven krenker EU-retten.
– Handlingsregelens fedre tenkte ikke på krig
